Archive for August, 2006
Thursday, August 31st, 2006
In spite of a nearly 9 hour homeowner’s meeting, numerous questions remain outstanding. At the meeting, Kay Phillips admitted there were communication problems between the board and the membership. Accordingly, with the spirit of communication in mind, we call upon the board to respond to our questions:
1) First, it is our understanding that 3 board members have resigned from the board: Greg Ogawa, Mark Fleenor & Guy Pierce. In spite of this, no notice has been posted to the membership either through the board website or the more widely read Hidden Lake News website. The board is charged with appointing new board members; however, the gossip is that a single board member, Kay Phillips, unilaterally made new appointments to the board. Is this true? Please respond.
2) Sandra Stokes was re-elected to the board. Kay Phillips and David Phillips are the hold-over appointments made by developer, Joe Machock. The bylaws provide each property owner with one vote per parcel; that is, a husband & wife owning a 20 acre parcel has only one vote between them. Kay & David Phillips, as board members, have two votes. Although Kay stated that she has only voted once to break a tie, it was enough. Because of Kay’s “second” vote, the membership is stuck with the antiquated, $15,000 more than was allocated for, Osh-Kosh dump truck. Why did both Phillips get to vote on this issue?
3) Many homeowners have contributed money or materials for the caretaker’s cabin. Frank & Jeannie Collins donated a dishwasher and $2000 for tile. This question would not be necessary if more communication was forthcoming from the board; however, the property manager was able to get a deal from an Angel Fire company on tile for the caretaker’s cabin. For some reason, Kay Phillips stepped in, took the Collins’ money and provided tile from her tile company. It is our understanding that she did not donate the tile; rather, she made a profit from this transaction. Perhaps Kay was able to provide us with a better deal; however, we have received no accounting on this. We are asking Kay Phillips to provide an accounting for the tile, including receipts and costs, which was paid for by a member of the HLPOA and which was originally to have been purchased in Angel Fire.
4) Why are we paying $1250 for fish and stocking the lake when there is so much algae and seaweed that fish could surely not survive?
5) We know that Joe Machock sold us the caretaker’s cabin and that he objected to any kind of environmental study on the property prior to purchase (and he won it with his proxies); however, we also know that there are alleged problems with the wiring and septic system, in spite of Kay Phillips’ assurances to the contrary at the annual meeting. What is the status of the caretaker’s cabin? Is the wiring up to code? What is the status of the septic system? May we please review the receipts? We ask that Kay Phillps provide us with proof, per her assurance at the annual meeting, that the electrical system for the caretaker’s cabin is up to code, per the UBC specifications.
6) In keeping with the spirit of open communication, we should be able to access minutes and information each time the board meets and/or discusses anything. Has the board met? By such meetings, we mean actual quorum of the board, not individual phone calls to each other. Please provide minutes and information regarding each meeting by the board. Additionally, we would be interested in why individual conversations are necessary rather than full participation by all of our representatives.
We call upon the board to answer our questions. We are not a “few” property/homeowners; rather we are some of the majority who have ongoing concerns regarding our investment at Hidden Lake. Thank you.
Liane Kerr/Paul Donisthorpe, Lot #49
Marilyn Borich/Jack Vlk, Lot #3 &4
Trevor & Erica Hatchell, Lot#52
Mike & Bonnie Vorst, Lot #61
George & Sandra Stokes, Lot #78
Jeannie & Frank Collins, Lot #75
Don & Bonnie Fink, Lot #94
Tina & Bill Frazelle, Lot #64
Mike Smith, Lot#82
M/M Mike Hudson, Lot#46
Karla and Bill Dobbs, Lot #31
Brad and Steph Snyder, Lot #79
Posted in General News | 1 Comment »
Wednesday, August 30th, 2006
I had an interesting phone conversation with our caretaker, Kris, yesterday. It seems that he wanted to know how to take a posting off my web site, and was looking for help in doing that task. I told him that I would do it for him, but was curious as to why he wanted to remove a posting.
Archive for August, 2006
Tuesday, August 8th, 2006
We are the McCornacks, and we own lot 8. At the end of the HLPOA annual meeting, we mentioned that we would like to proceed forward with the planning and construction of a home built by Luxury Living Homes. Don Fink mentioned this in his notes regarding the annual meeting. Because this home is not built on-site, and off-site construction has been a cause for concern by some property owners, we wanted to communicate our plans to the Hidden Lake property owners, encourage them to visit the Luxury Living Homes model in Angel Fire (located on Highway 434 in Angel Fire just north of Willie’s Smokehouse on the west side of the highway), and let them know we welcome their comments regarding our plans.
We mentioned in the first paragraph that the home we are considering would be built off-site. Because it is built off-site, we have heard this type of home referred to as a manufactured home, a pre-fab home, a modular home, and other similar labels. Luxury Living Homes themselves refer to it as off site conventional construction. Personally, we no longer care how people refer to it as long as they are judging the home itself and not the label attached to it, and as long as people understand it is not a mobile home. The reason the term off-site conventional construction is used is to convey the fact that the actual construction is the same as on-site construction – same materials, same building codes, same overall building techniques – but the majority of the home is constructed off site. Once built, the home is transported and completed at the home site. A home built by Luxury Living Homes is transported in four major sections. The home is permanently installed on a foundation at the home site. When complete, the manner of construction – off-site versus on-site – is not evident. The home that we have in mind is the Candlewood model which is a two-story, chalet-style home approximately 1740 square feet in size with a 24’ by 46’ footprint. It would contain a great room, kitchen, utility room, a master bedroom and bathroom, two extra bedrooms with a shared full bathroom, and either an attached 2-car garage or a combination basement/2 car garage. The model also includes a nice large deck.Our goal is to submit a home proposal package to the HLPOA board’s Architectural Control Committee in October and work toward having a home in place by next summer. We think we actually could have a package together by September, but we wish to give people an opportunity to comment, so we set October as our target. To reach this goal we will be working with Luxury Living Homes to prepare a preliminary set of plans showing our chosen floor plan, various elevations, the foundation, and a site plan.
In talking with several people at the HLPOA annual meeting, we heard several positive comments about Luxury Living Homes. People had either seen the model or had looked at the brochures we brought to the meeting. We do feel that this home would be of the style and quality desired for Hidden Lake; however, in the spirit of cooperativeness, as we proceed forward toward our October goal, we will take into account comments provided on this web site, as well as those sent directly to us at mccornack_lot8@yahoo.com before we submit our package to the Architectural Control Committee.
Posted by Don Fink for the McCornacks
Posted in Off-Site Construction | 1 Comment »
Monday, August 7th, 2006
Anyone wishing to assist with the bylaws/covenants committee, please contact Liane Kerr via email correspondence at Leklawyer@aol.com and include your phone number with the communication.
Posted in General News | No Comments »
Tuesday, August 1st, 2006
Lake Report
Dave Phillips reported that the lake was recently stocked. He would like to hear from people who fished, to know if anyone was catching fish. He wasn’t aware of anyone catching any fish for several years. Several people mentioned that the lake smelled and had algae. They asked if the health of the lake had been checked before the fish were planted. David mentioned that the person who planted the fish checked the water’s PH level after the fish were released, but said that the PH levels were okay. He also said that it would take $7,000 to $8,000 to have a full study done on the lake.There was further discussion on other less expensive ways of determining the lake’s health, and how good of an idea it was to have the person selling the fish assessing the health of the lake.A motion was made to form a committee of property owners to research ways to check the health of the lake. Motion carried.
Hidden Lake POA Membership Directory
A long discussion went on about how hard and expensive it was to create a directory. Many suggestion were made from the property owners to do as much of it as possible electronically; via eMail or web site. The board seemed to have an issue with using technology to communicate, but maybe that’s just my opinion sneaking in again. I made a motion that we publish a new membership directory annually. Another property owner had a proposed By-law change that accomplished essentially the same thing, so I withdrew the motion.
There was also discussion where Kay related that several property owners had threatened to sue the board if their contact information was published. The specific number of persons who didn’t want their information made available was not known, or at least I missed that part of her answer. It was also mentioned that most of the contact information about property owners is public knowledge; that all one has to do is go to the county offices in Raton and ask for it.
Later, the By-law was proposed and passed by majority vote, which obligates the board to publish a new directory each year. The preferred method of distributing the directory will be eMail to keep costs at a minimum. The by-law basically says that a directory will be published once a year. Folks who do not want their information published will not be published. They will also not receive a directory (the thought here is that information flows both ways).
Covenants and By-laws Update
Mark Fleenor gave a presentation on updating the covenants and by-laws. A long discussion took place about why the work of several members last year was never addressed by the board. It seems that people did a considerable amount of work on the by-laws and covenants, only to have their efforts ignored by the board.
The explanation gave by Kay was that when the board was threatened with a law suit about the off-site manufactured home, all work stopped on all other projects. To better phrase it, all communication with property owners stopped. Kay said that this was the advice of legal council.
Now, here goes my opinion again, but you really have to wonder about the usefulness of legal council that tells you to shut down your corporation because someone threatened a legal action. Let’s translate that over to a commercial corporation, and examine the feasibility of shutting down for five months.
I’m not an attorney, but I did spend several years managing employees with an extremely hostile union (National Air Traffic Controller’s Association). There was rarely a day that went by that we weren’t threatened with a grievance, an Unfair Labor Practice Charge (which was heard in federal court), or a civil lawsuit. Consider what would have happened if we simply refused to speak to our employees because we were engaged in unpleasant business with one subject or another. I’m sorry but this is just about the silliest thing I’ve ever heard.
Kay said that if this happens again, the board will again refuse to communicate with the membership. This is unacceptable! End of this particular opinion!
Mark Fleenor said that the board was considering hiring a consulting firm to update our covenants. Of course, there was a long discussion of why we were spending money to an outside firm when we had folks in the membership who could and would do that at no cost. In all fairness, the idea of hiring a consulting firm was a proposal before the membership, and not a done deal.
A motion was made to form a committee of property owners to address the work that folks had already done last year and get input from other interested property owners about changes to the by-laws and covenants, then get information out to everyone. Motion carried.
Discussion and Voting on Changes to By-Laws
(These may not be in the actual order, as we’re working from a “pile” of notes here)
Proposal: Creating four board officers instead of three. There was originally the President, Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer. The proposal broke off the Secretary/Treasurer position into two separate jobs. Proposal passed.
Proposal: Setting permanent annual meeting dates. One proposal called for meeting dates to be set for the last Saturday in July. Another called for the meeting to be set for the first Saturday in August. There was some discussion, and the first Saturday in August was set as the permanent annual meeting date. Time and place will be set by the board each year.
Proposal: Current membership list will be maintained and distributed to the membership each year. See the discussion above for more details. Proposal passed.
Proposal: Terms for newly elected board director shall begin at midnight, September 1st following their election at the annual meeting. Some discussion. Proposal failed.
Proposal: Filling vacancies on the board. Currently, when a vacancy occurs on the board of directors, the board will appoint a new property owner to fill the position for the remainder of the normal term of the person who left. With the new proposal, the board will appoint a new board member who will serve until the next annual meeting. At the annual meeting, the membership will elect a new director who will then serve for the remainder of the vacant term. Proposal Passed.
Proposal: All decisions made by the board of directors except for daily operations and emergencies must be ratified within 60 days by vote of the owners. There was a long discussion about this proposal. One owner suggested that we vote to not ratify, and the absence of voting constituted approval.
Here goes my opinion again – I personally support this idea for two reasons. First, I don’t trust the board to do the right thing. They have proven many times over that they will fail at nearly every opportunity. Secondly, I have worked in an environment where union officials needed to have their membership ratify major decisions, and the idea – although somewhat of a burden to the union management – works. It keeps people in check, and it also takes union management (in this case the board) off the hook in controversial situations.
There was lengthy discussion about having to trust the board to manage operations. The proposal was tabled until the by-law/covenant committee could look it over. They will see if the terms used can be further defined to everyone’s satisfaction and we’ll address this again at the next annual meeting.
Election of new board members:
New members are (in no particular order)
- Bill Frazelle
- Mike Vorst
- Sandra Stokes (re-elected)
Existing board members (again, in no particular order)
- Greg Ogawa
- Kay Phillips
- Dave Phillips
- Joe Stehling
It was brought out that Joe would be resigning soon. The question was made that maybe Joe might want to resign at the meeting, so the membership could elect a new board member. The answer was that no, Joe would probably resign in October and the board would appoint its own person at that time.
Now I ask you, would it have been so difficult to resign now and let the membership pick a suitable replacement? What exactly is Joe going to do between now and October that requires him to be on the board? Or, are you thinking that maybe Joe and the board are simply trying to prevent the membership from having some say in Hidden Lake affairs? There’s a comment section at the end of this article. I really would like to know why Joe resigning at the meeting was such a bad idea.
Off Site Manufactured Homes
There was more discussion about off-site manufactured homes. The owners of the property who are proposing to construct a pre-manufactured home were at the meeting, and they gave in impromptu report on their activities.
They are looking at a manufactured home that’s currently being modeled in Angel Fire. It was decided that we would place photos on the home on the http://www.hiddenlakenews.com/ web site, along with other information. From this information, the property owners who care can engage in discussion. The board promised to take a quick peak at those discussions to see what everyone else was thinking.
At the present time, I am investigating different software packages that will allow full-on forums to be placed on this site. There are two packages I’m considering. The first is simply a plugin to the core software that runs the site, but it doesn’t seem to want to play nice with my theme modifications. The second is a stand alone package. It’s advantage is that it’s full featured, and we can do absolutely anything that any other forum software can do. The disadvantage is that people would end up with two sing-ons; one for the forum and one for the comments to these posts.
Why Two Web Sites:
Guy Pierce made an introduction to the “official” Hidden Lake web site. It’s URL is http://www.hiddenlakepoa.org/. The question was put to Guy over why there were two sites. Guy simply said that http://www.hiddenlakenews.com/ was Don’s site, and the new site was the board’s. Of course, he corrected himself and stated that http://www.hiddenlakepoa.org/ was the property owner’s site.
Guy also mentioned that “Don’s” site allowed for open discussion and that the new official site never would.
I would have made a proposal here, but I promised Guy that I would never get into a feud over web sites. The proposal has actually been made several times to the board, but never with a reasonable response from them. In the past – and the offer still stands – I have offered exclusive space on my site for the board’s use. While I have never received a response other than Joe Stehling saying that he didn’t want to participate in a web site who will only “bitch” about the board, and Greg Ogawa saying that he really didn’t have time to look at it, my offer still stands.
The difference now is that, in the future, if the board decides to move their activities over to my site and save some money (this site is done entirely at my expense), I’ll ask someone like Guy Pierce or an acting board member to administer that portion of the site. That keeps my workload down, and gives them free access to put up whatever information they want, when they please.
Move to Impeach:
At the very end of the meeting, a motion was made for a vote of no confidence, and ultimate removal of the current board. This motion was seconded. During the discussion, several members pointed out that this move was as underhanded as the actions of the current board, since so many people had left the meeting and therefore had no opportunity to participate.
After lengthy discussion, the motion was withdrawn, and the statement was made to the board that this was a wake up call. If this motion would have been put to a vote, the motion would have certainly carried and the board would have been removed.
Their performance is unacceptable to a large majority of the property owners, and changes will occur. Since no provision to remove board members exists in the current by-laws, and Roberts Rules don’t specifically support removal, the by-law/covenant committee will look at amendments that provides for such an action.
A word about Communications:
It was my concern at the beginning of this meeting that the board has failed miserably in communicating with the property owners. They have been somewhat deceptive at best, and downright dishonest in other cases. I truly believe that the majority of all problems with the performance of the board come from this one fault in their culture.
They have seriously failed in reading the desires of the property owners. Those of us who reached out to challenge them on this and other issues are regarded as a small minority of the property owners, when in fact we are made up of a very large portion of the membership. We comprise enough of the population that changes are inevitable. We will do what we need to do to bring about positive change to the behavior of this board. Whether that involves removing the remaining folks who simply don’t get it, or whether it means educating them to our perception of their responsibilities, I for one don’t care. So long as we bring about the changes that correct the behavior I’ll be satisfied.
Unfortunately, at the end of the meeting, my impression was that not one of the old members of the board got the message. Whether we simply let their terms run out and not re-elect them, or whether we enact by-laws that allow for their removal is yet to be seen, but changes will take place.
It is also my sincere desire that we can get back on track and move forward with only the usual amount of hate and discontent. After all, this is my home here at Hidden Lake. It’s my only home, and I deal with these issues each and every day. Personally, I’m tired.
Don Fink
Posted in The Board, General News | No Comments »
Before we start, I would like to refer to the note at the end of this article, and remind everyone that Kris, our caretaker, is not involved in this discussion. Even though his situation has inspired this article, he encouraged me not to pursue it because he is in fear of losing his job.
He told me that Joe Stehling had informed him that he was not allowed to make comments on my web site that were not specifically approved by the board. Let me say this again, in case some of you are just skimming this article. Kris told me that he was not allowed to make comments or postings on my web site unless they were specifically approved by the board.
Now, if I was going to go flying off the handle, this is where I would do it. I would accuse the board of not allowing Kris his basic right of free speech. I would say that they were suppressing the truth. I would even ask why the board was intentionally crippling this young man’s desire to openly communicate with his employers, the property owners. I would ask LtCol Stehling how he could put in a whole career defending our American way, when in the end it comes down to this; he’s got to stifle a few comments from a caretaker at Hidden Lake.
When you think about it, it’s not uncommon for a company to regulate the information that flows out to the public. The government does this all the time. So you might ask, why am I upset about Joe Stehling suppressing comments from the caretaker at Hidden Lake?
The problem is simply this:
The board a Hidden Lake has a history of failing to communicate with the property owners. They have failed at every opportunity to bring honest and true information forward. In our last property owner’s meeting, we sat there for about nine hours trying to bring this information to light. We pondered at the absolute refusal to communicate with anyone at Hidden Lake for several months because of the threat of a lawsuit. We wondered why Kay can’t answer a simple question without going around in circles, instead of providing a simple, truthful answer to pretty much any question (yes, I have it on video tape if you doubt this behavior).
This is a really simple concept, this communications thing. But the board still does not appear to understand. Their answer is to post an Annual Meeting After Action Report where they (Joe Stehling wrote it, but being a board member, I assume he speaks for the board) accused some of us of “animosity, hostility, vindictiveness, and outright rudeness.” Of course, all this activity was met with outright cursing at us from the board, but who’s counting?
The point is, Joe was allowed to post his comments on my web site without review, but Kris is not allowed to speak. I suppose the question is, who does Kris work for? Does he work for the board, or does he work for the property owners. The question is important. If Kris does indeed work for the board, then they have the right to control his free speech in matters related to Hidden Lake. They have the right to withhold the truth from the property owners by not allowing our caretaker to speak. They have the right to feed to you the property owner only the information they believe you should know. Right?….
But if Kris works for the “association”, and therefore the property owners in general, I want to know what he has to say. I want to hear the truth from every person related to Hidden Lake. I understand that Joe sometimes gets a little wrapped up in our dialog personally, and the truth sometimes gets away from him just a bit, but I expect truthful and honest dialog from our caretaker. Consider Kris’s position for a moment. When I ask Kris a question as a property owner, I expect a truthful answer. When he fails to respond, he’s not being truthful, and I simply cannot accept that from an employee of the association. So where does that leave Kris? For those of you who are new to our little community, you might not understand that the caretaker is not being truthful because the board won’t allow it. I ask again, where does that leave Kris?
In the end, I can’t think of a single reason why every person associated with Hidden Lake should not be truthful and honest in every way with every other person up here. As property owners, we have the expectation that the board will respond to our concerns in open and truthful dialog. For those of you who have tried, you know that this has not been the case in the past. Now that we have spent a considerable amount of time and energy trying to fix this problem, I find that the board is still not interested in providing the truth.
I have taken Kris’s comments off my web site as he requested, but here’s another proposal, and I’ll just throw it out for comment. Unless someone can give me a valid reason why a board member should be allowed to post items on my web site when Kris cannot, maybe I should start reviewing the comments of the board or individual board members to ensure that I agree with them before their comments go up. Maybe I should suppress anyone who does not agree with me personally before they post on my site. After all, it is my site, and I do indeed pay all the expense. Does that sound right? Of course it doesn’t! Most of you would be outright annoyed if I started “approving” the comments of individuals before they went up on my site. The dialog would be irrelevant if I attempted to control its content. But that’s exactly what Joe is doing to Kris.
If you think that the board should control Kris’s dialog with his employers, the property owners, then you should join Craig and Pam Morris and thank the board for a “job well done”. If, however, you believe in honesty and openness here at Hidden Lake, then you should join the large number of property owners who believe that it’s time for the present board (newly elected and re-elected people excluded) to move out of the way and let us get on with the honest business of managing our community.
Note: I would like to point out that this article has been posted without the knowledge of our caretaker, Kris. After the phone conversation we had he was genuinely concerned for his job, and asked me not to “get him into trouble” with the board. He was truly afraid that he would be fired if I continued this argument. I would like to make it perfectly clear that Kris is not involved in this issue. He is simply trying to do his job, and get through these troubled times intact. I assure everyone that, when we finally get these people off the board, and get responsible, honest people in place, Kris will emerge an outstanding and hard working employee.
Don Fink
Lot 94
Posted in The Board | 1 Comment »
Wednesday, August 23rd, 2006
Craig & Pam Morris asked me to post this message they sent to the HLPOA board president
TO: Hidden Lake POA Board of Directors
FROM: Craig and Pam Morris, Lot #92
DATE: August 2, 2006
RE: 2006 Annual Meeting
My name is Craig Morris, my wife, Pam, and I attended the 2006 Hidden Lake POA annual meeting and feel compelled to write this letter. We want to express our concern about how the meeting was conducted. We feel the Board did not control the meeting at all and because of that, vital issues and discussions were put on hold while the membership present sat through a torrid of Board bashing. We would like to address just a few of our concerns.
1. The main purpose of our annual meeting is to discuss issues at hand, i.e.: the agenda. Mr. Frank Collins was allowed to place his own issues on the agenda and the issues were out of order. Dealing with the purchase of the snow removal equipment should have been delayed until New Business. His behavior reminded us of a 6 year old boy being pulled out of the toy department, screaming because he did not get the toy he wanted. It was very apparent that early into his rhetoric, the Board should have stopped and deferred his issues till later in the agenda. The longer we sat and listened to him the angrier we became. Had we known how this meeting was going be conducted we would not have attended at all.
2. On the subject of Mr. Collin’s discussion regarding the snow removal
equipment—his perception of last years meeting is not ours and we do not
agree with him at all. No matter what anyone says, a backhoe is not
considered snow removal equipment. So Mr. Collins spent 364 days
stewing on this issue, planning out his attack on the Board for not buying the
backhoe and YOU made us sit through it. Thank you!!
3. We are requesting that Mr. Collins submit the names and lot numbers of the
property owners that he quoted in the dissertation that he gave the
membership. We requested this information during the meeting however,
Mr. Collins could not remember who these individuals were at the time. This
should be added to the minutes as an addendum.
4. We are making an official request to amend the Bylaws to limit the number
of proxy votes that can be held by one property owner at the annual
meeting. We are concerned that one property owner had 20 proxy votes.
That is one fifth the membership vote. This person, through his/her proxy
votes is able to sway any vote his/her way. What is the point of voting when
it can be controlled by one lot owner? If a property owner can not make the
annual meeting, they should request an absentee ballot with the issues that
are to be voted on at the annual meeting. This would allow each property
owner the ability to make their own decision(s). It is going to be easier to
disseminate information to the membership through the 2 websites.
Finally, on a personal note, we would like to congratulate the incoming board members on their election. We would also like to thank the current board members who will be leaving, for a difficult job well done. We would say to all the board members not to let one or two unhappy property owners discourage you. They do not reflect the feelings of all the membership. We feel that if Roberts Rule of Order had been followed our annual meeting would have been a productive meeting with many important issues being dealt with rather than the embarrassing display that occurred.
Posted by Joe Stehling at the request of Craig and Pam Morris.
Posted in General News | No Comments »
Friday, August 11th, 2006
HLPOA ANNUAL MEETING AFTER ACTION REPORT
Please Note: I originally tried to post this on 1 August prior to a trip. Somehow it never made into the Posted area.
I was prepared for a difficult annual meeting of the HLPOA on 29 July 2006. What I was not prepared for was the high level of animosity, hostility, vindictiveness, and outright rudeness of some of the members. It got so bad that my wife, Carol, could take no more and went home in tears. Others told me they had to leave the room because they felt the anger welling up within them. I will admit I was rude at one time when I lost my cool after Jeanne Collins’ fourth or fifth interruption of a speaker to continue to chastise the board for their decision on the manufactured home issue, regardless of what issue was being discussed at the time of her interruption. I apologize to the assemblage for my outburst and my use of a curse word. What I should have said was that there is a difference between constructive criticism that focuses on success and destructive tirades that focus on nothing but failure. That was the tenure of the Collins’ tirades- focusing only on perceived failures.
The only constructive comment I heard (which is not new) was that the board needed to increase communication, which is true. However, you should know that in January, Mark Fleenor put together a newsletter to be distributed in January with the annual dues invoices. I personally had written three articles for the newsletter. After the litigation threat letter on manufactured homes was received by the board, the association’s lawyers put a stop to any communication. Lawyers do more harm than good at times.
That is not to say that some positive things did not come out of the meeting. Several committees were formed which could have a positive influence on the association, if they all do their job. But that is about all I can think of at the moment.
I moved to Hidden Lake to make friends, not enemies. My wife believes that we now have more enemies than friends, not because of anything we have done personally to or against certain individuals, but by virtue only of my being on the board. One of our previous so-called friends egregiously betrayed a sacred trust by passing on information provided to them in confidence. They also used Kris to further their agenda by including his candid comments in Mr. Collins’ board bashing speech.
The last minute maneuver by Jeanne Collins at the very end of the meeting when a good 60 percent of the assemblage had departed was especially devious and underhanded. Without an understanding of what she was doing and the implications thereof, she called for the resignation of the entire board. This caused a referral to Roberts Rules of Order, which evidently provides for a vote of no confidence, but not for removal of any board member. I am wondering how many of the 20 members who provided proxy votes to Marilyn Borich were aware of this and would have voted for the wholesale removal of the board causing the association to lose all corporate memory and knowledge. Members must realize the danger of providing so much power (20% of the property owners in this case) to one individual with an ill-defined agenda, who can do nothing but criticize and complain. As President Bush said in his State of the Union address: “Hindsight alone is not wisdom, and second-guessing is not a strategy”.
That recall maneuver has caused me to rethink my decision to resign from the board. Several members expressed regret that I was considering resigning and I will now fulfill the rest of my term as a board member. If I choose to resign, I prefer to do it on my own volition and not because a small coalition of members with an ill-defined agenda wants me to resign.
Joe Stehling
Lot 11
Posted in General News | 1 Comment »
Thursday, August 10th, 2006
Good Evening Neighbors:
We, like so many others, are tired of the in-fighting that has been going on at Hidden Lake; however, we cannot stand by and watch some of the issues which are of concern to everyone.
For example, the lake has been over-run by algae for the last several years and nothing has been done. Obviously, the lake is cold, but no-one would risk falling in due to the algae problem coupled with leeches. In addition, the shrinking condition of the lake has made it difficult to access the lake due to the mud, which could “take a body down” if one isn’t careful. Each year, we have put in a temporary floating dock and each fall we have taken it out. We have encouraged folks to use it freely and in fact, many persons have used the dock to access the lake. The dock prevents the user from sinking into the mud when accessing a boat. We think the association should finance 3 more floating docks and we will contribute ours to the association as the 4th to allow everyone access to the lake, said docks to be placed at the (hopefully cleared) edges to each of the 4 easements.
A second, and in our opinion, very serious matter, is the Board’s clandestine behavior regarding all aspects of management of our properties. As indicated by Don Fink’s postings regarding the annual meeting, it was arduous and contentious—-and Mike Vorst, Sandra Stokes and William Frazelle soundly defeated all challengers for the Board. We just heard (through the grapevine, but confirmed by several people) that Greg Ogawa and Mark Fleenor (beaten in re-election bid) resigned, effective immediately, from the Board. Rather than replace them with those persons who ran and received majority votes, our Madam President (1/2 of the board duo of David and Kay Phillips, which is such an obvious conflict) appointed two persons who ran for the Board, but who were defeated by the electorate. What kind of kingdom do we have here?
In a second appointment surprise, we understand that Joe Stehling resigned from managing Chris Perault. Rather than appoint Don Fink, Bonnie Fink, Marilyn Borich or Jack Vlk—long-time property and home owners who all get along well with Chris—to the position, our Madam president (again, that 1/2 of the duo team) apparently appointed a new property owner, who no-one knows but is endorsed by that duo! Chris is even in the dark!
Again, it would seem that the issues which arose at the Board meeting (including a motion to recall the Board due to their inability to communicate and their “royal” attitudes, which has contributed to the in-fighting at HL) fell on deaf ears. We feel like the Scots in the border wars—-loyal to the last, but losing power to the king!
Liane Kerr & Paul Donisthorpe, Lot 49
(all hail the common folk)
Posted in General News | No Comments »